Bottom line - the air show was awesome. My son had a blast (the Shockwave jet truck was a big hit) and I was left with the same patriotic awe and inspiration as years past. I'm still thunderstruck by the engineering feats that we have achieved, as a country and as a species.
I'm also equally blown away by our continually jaw-dropping idiocy. Chatting with one of the aforementioned millennial pilots (I'm no senior citizen, but this kid was definitely born during the Clinton administration), he told me that while some of his superiors had received iPads for flight plans, he had not. When I pressed him, he admitted that he used his own personal iPad... with a handy app that he had downloaded from the App Store, of course. I was flummoxed. Yes, the app (which shall remain nameless) has an excellent reputation and yes, it has a specific setup for military usage, including a worldwide library of Department of Defense Digital Flight Information Publications (D-FLIP) terminal procedures, airport diagrams, enroute charts and publications. Very handy.
But who is authorizing this? Or rather, who is looking the other way on this? I'm not suggesting that the app is corrupt (although they fail to include FIPS 140-2 validation). I recognize that the pilots are supposed to download their relevant data before takeoff and disable cellular signal while in flight. Good rules of thumb. But how about that GPS chip in the tablet? That's a major tracking beacon that has not been officially sanctioned. Or what if someone has hacked the app and is enjoying a MITM attack, collecting all user destination data? In that case, they could theoretically isolate the military users, even the type of plane and originating location. Gee, that wouldn't be helpful information at all.
New solutions are a balancing act and always have been. We constantly have to be vigilant, weighing the advantages of the technology with the compromises that we recognize in the current version before we can feel comfortable deploying it in sensitive environments such as the military. This is a recurring theme in our CEO's talks nationwide at security and technology conferences. It's just not enough to build something better - it has to be secure. And it's not enough to build something secure - it has to be ready faster. And if it's secure and fast? Yes, it's gotta be better than what's already out there.
As a technology vendor, you need to enter production faster. Getting bogged down in the FIPS 140-2 process is a fools' errand, but we definitely have it figured it out. Build your product, add CryptoComply, move fast, beat your competitors, and win market share.
If you've got the need for speed, then you need RapidCert.
P.S. - Top Gun 2 is in the works, bringing back Tom Cruise as Maverick. Seriously.